Trump’s Legal Crackdown on Law Firms Backfires as Courts Block Retaliatory Order
- M.R Mishra
- Mar 30
- 2 min read
In a striking rebuke to the Trump administration’s campaign of political retribution, federal judges have blocked key provisions of an executive order targeting two prominent law firms tied to past investigations of the former president.
The March 28 rulings mark another judicial pushback against what critics call an unconstitutional weaponization of government power this time, against the legal profession itself.
The Executive Order: Punishing Trump’s Legal Adversaries
The contested order, signed earlier this month, suspended security clearances for attorneys at Jenner & Block and Wilmer Hale firms that played roles in the Mueller investigation and other Trump-related probes. The administration accused them of "anti-Trump bias" and sought to bar them from federal contracts, citing a need to "depoliticize the legal system."
But the move was widely seen as retaliation:
Jenner & Block represented witnesses in Trump’s impeachment trials and January 6 cases.
WilmerHale housed special counsel Robert Mueller and key prosecutors.
Courts Deliver Twin Blows to the Administration
In simultaneous rulings, federal judges Richard Leon (D.C.) and John Bates (D.D.C.) froze the order’s enforcement, citing irreparable harm to the firms: The judges agreed the order likely chilled attorneys’ free speech and association rights by penalizing past legal work.
The administration failed to provide evidence of misconduct or a rationale for blanket disqualification. The order risked "destroying" the firms by cutting off their government-facing practices, Bates wrote.
Notably, the rulings align with earlier decisions blocking Trump’s attempts to dismantle agencies like the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and Voice of America, where judges cited similar overreach.
While the injunctions are temporary, the administration could appeal—but legal experts doubt success given the rulings’ strong constitutional footing. Meanwhile, other firms are scrambling to assess their vulnerability. As one Jenner & Block partner told CNN: "This was never about ethics. It was about silencing dissent."
Why This Matters
Beyond the legal profession, the rulings signal that Trump’s aggressive tactics face limits. As with the VOA and CFPB cases, courts are drawing lines to protect institutional independence from political vendettas.
Comments