In a landmark ruling on 17 October 2025, the Supreme Court in Atomberg Technologies Pvt. Ltd. v. Eureka Forbes Ltd.  (2025 INSC 1253) addressed the increasing phenomenon of forum shopping  in intellectual property disputes , while clarifying the independent statutory footing of “groundless threats” actions under Section 106 of the Patents Act, 1970. The Court ordered the transfer of Eureka Forbes’ patent infringement suit from the Delhi High Court to the Bombay High Court, w

India is taking a significant step to close a major gap in its intellectual property framework by actively considering a dedicated trade...

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 1942 decision in Mishawaka Rubber & Woolen Manufacturing Co. v. S. S. Kresge Co.  is a cornerstone in American...

Lululemon has filed a federal lawsuit against Costco, accusing the retail giant of selling knockoff versions of its signature apparel...

On April 15, 2025 , the Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment in Cryogas Equipment Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Inox India Ltd. , ...

Cybersquatting is the practice of registering, using, or selling a domain name that takes advantage of someone else’s trademark,...

Hollywood is no stranger to drama, but the legal battle unfolding between Justin Baldoni’s Wayfarer Studios and actress Blake Lively ...

The Department of Justice has recommended that Google be broken up as an antitrust remedy, citing its monopoly in the search market. The...

Case Background: Plaintiff: M/s KG Marketing India, represented by its proprietor, Mr. Karan Kumar. Defendants: Ms. Rashi Santosh Soni...

The renowned Taj Mahal Palace hotel in the city has secured an 'image trademark,' becoming the first building in India to receive...

Scarlett Johansson’s iconic voice brought the AI assistant in the 2013 film "Her" to life, highlighting the potential risks of technology...